Reach Us +1-947-333-4405

The Effects of Aquatic Exercise on Functional Capacity and Health-Related Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients

Samara Anastasia1*, Kouidi Evangelia1, Fountoulakis Konstantinos2, Alexiou Serafeim1 and Deligiannis Asterios1

1Laboratory of Sports Medicine, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

2Department of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

*Corresponding Author:
Samara Anastasia
Laboratory of Sports Medicine
Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, Greece
Tel: 00306947454790
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: June 16, 2016; Accepted Date: July 15, 2016; Published Date: July 18, 2016

Citation: Anastasia S, Evangelia K, Konstantinos F, Serafeim A, Asterios D (2016) The Effects of Aquatic Exercise on Functional Capacity and Health-related Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients. J Clin Exp Nephrol 1:15. doi: 10.21767/2472-5056.100015

Copyright: © 2016 Anastasia S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 
Visit for more related articles at Journal of Clinical & Experimental Nephrology

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an aquatic program in functional capacity and quality of life in hemodialysis patients.
Patients and methods: The study included 27 patients. Group A (n=15) followed an exercise program in a swimming pool and group B (n=12) were the controls. Six Minute Walk tests, Sit to Stand test, Sit and Reach test, Handgrip test, Timed Up and Go test were evaluated. All participants also completed SF-36 Questionnaire.
Results: After the aquatic program improvement was observed in all physical parameters and quality of life questionnaire in exercise group. The 6MWT distance increased from 558.8 ± 127.5 m to 625.6 ± 128.1 (p<0.05), the Sit to Stand test from 17.6 ± 5.2 sec to 15.2 ± 5.4 (p<0.05), Handgrip strength test from 34.6 ± 14.2 kg to 37.2 ± 14.7 (p<0.05), Sit and Reach test from 4.7 ± 9.1 cm to -0.6 ± 8.4 (p<0.05), Timed Up and Go test from 5.5 ± 1.4 sec to 4.6 ± 1.4 (p<0.05). Group B reduced its performance in 6-Min walk test from 499.1 ± 94.6 m to 454.4 ± 90.4 (p<0.05), Handgrip test from 34.3 ± 9.6 kg to 32.3 ± 9.9 (p<0.05), and Timed Up and Go from 6.1 ± 1.7 sec to 6.6 ± 2.5 (p<0.05). In SF-36 questionnaire, Group A improved both in Physical and Mental Component Scale and compared to Group B.
Conclusion: The results demonstrated that aquatic exercise improves physical functioning and quality of life in hemodialysis patients.

Keywords

Aquatic exercise; Chronic kidney disease patients; Functional capacity; Quality of life

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis (HD) show significantly diminished exercise capacity, tolerance, strength and endurance, compared to healthy individuals. Anaemia, cardiac dysfunction, muscle abnormalities, depression and sedentary lifestyle affect negatively their functional capacity, as well as their reported quality of life [1,2]. Low levels of physical activity levels in HD patients have been associated with increased risk of hospitalization and rates of morbidity [3].

It is well established by studies that exercise rehabilitation programs contribute positively to an improvement in the functional capacity and psychosocial status of HD patients [4-6]. Aerobic and resistance exercise programs have been applied to patients during HD or in rehabilitation centers [1,5], with numerous beneficial effects, although outpatient exercise training has been proved to be more effective compared to intradialytic exercise [1]. Despite the established benefits of exercise training programs, dropout rate remains high due to lack of motivation [7]. Thus it is required the implementation of alternative forms of exercise in order to increase patients’ participation and compliance.

In recent studies, aquatic rehabilitation programs have been proven to improve physical capacity in a wide range of diseases, such as chronic heart failure, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis and multiple sclerosis [8-11].

Aquatic exercise through water’s physical properties, such as buoyancy, hydrostatic pressure, viscosity and density, provides an ideal environment to exercise throughout the year. The buoyancy of water supports body weight resulting in reduced joint loading and improved flexibility. The resistive forces of viscous drag and turbulence provide resistance to movements, which helps muscle strengthening. Exercises in water can also improve agility, balance, and cardiovascular fitness and minimizes the risk of falls when compared to exercise on land [11,12].

Although there is growing interest of innovative forms of exercise on renal function in patients with moderate renal failure, there is no study to date concerning aquatic exercise on HD patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an aquatic exercise program on functional capacity and health related quality of life in chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis.

Patients and Methods

Twenty nine patients, male (n=24) and female (n=5), with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, volunteered to participate in the study from a total of 200 patients from major nephrology clinics of Thessaloniki after a short briefing of the research. They were randomly assigned by simple allocation (drawing lots) to either a 4-month therapeutic aquatic exercise program (Group A-15 patients), or control status (Group B- 12 patients). Inclusion criteria were primarily to be evaluated by the participant’s nephrologist who gave authorization to exercise testing. All patients should also be on hemodialysis three days per week, 4 hours/session, for at least six months prior to the study and there should be no acute or chronic medical conditions that would affect the measured data. Exclusion criteria were recent myocardial infarction (within 6 weeks), malignant arrhythmias, or unstable angina. Hemoglobin level should be above 10 gr/dl and constant throughout the study, and medical prescription should not involve b-blockers or other anti-arrhythmic medication. In Group a fifteen subjects (thirteen male) completed all phases of assessment and intervention. In Group B twelve subjects (eleven male) were also assessed, at the beginning and at the end of four months. Two patients dropped out of the study due to lack of interest and for personal reasons (family health issues). The participants had to be in a clinically stable condition for at least three months before entering the study and remained in a stable medication regimen during the study. They were also asked to refrain from any other form of recreational activity during the study period and required to fulfil the 80% attendance during the training programs. In addition, Group B had no formal intervention and was asked to continue their usual sedentary lifestyle. All patients were informed about the purpose and the procedures of the study and gave written informed consent, according to the Ethical Committee of the Aristotle University.

Study Design

Physical fitness assessment-exercise testing

The physical capacity of all patients at the beginning of the study was determined on an “off” dialysis day with the following functional capacity tests.

1. Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), an indirect test to estimate cardiovascular endurance and functional capacity (13-14). The participants were asked to walk the longest distance possible in 6 minutes by walking continuously (not running or jogging) on a 20 meter measured corridor, turning around at the final mark without stopping and covering as much as ground possible. They could stop if needed and restart. The distance covered in meters was recorded at the end of the test. The 6MWT is one of the most utilized tests in chronic diseases [13,14]. It is easy to apply, almost costless, quick in performing, and is considered to be a better indicator of the ability to perform activities that resemble those of daily living, such as walking, than physiological exercise capacity testing [15].

2. Sit to Stand test, to specify muscular strength, measured the time (in seconds) required to perform 10 consecutive repetitions of sitting down and getting up from a chair. Participants were instructed to perform the task “as fast as possible”, starting and finishing at the sitting position. They began the test by crossing their arms on the chest and sitting with their backs against the chair [16]. This test is simple, inexpensive, rapid and reproducible and is used for people with renal disease [15,17,18].

3. Sit and Reach test was used to measure flexibility of hamstrings and lower back [19]. Patients were sat with their legs spread ahead, their heels touching the specific instrument and their palms one on top of the other. They should bend their torso over, keeping the position for two seconds without bending the knees. The best of three trials was recorded, in centimetres, as the distance of the middle finger till the measurement instrument on the box.

4. A handgrip dynamometer (Baseline Handgrip Dynamometer) was used to measure the power of dominant upper arm. Participants were in the sitting position, holding the dynamometer so that the forearm was at a right angle with the upper arm with the elbow close to the body. Three consecutive maximal repetitions of 3 seconds each, with 10 seconds of rest between the repetitions, were performed with the dominant arm. The average measurement in kg was recorded [15].

5. Finally, Timed Up and Go test was used to evaluate functional mobility [20]. Patients rose from a standard, armless chair to a full standing position, walked 3 m, turned around and returned to the seated position, performing these manoeuvres as fast as possible. Walking speed was determined to the nearest 0.01s.

Health-related quality of life assessment

All patients were also requested to complete the Short Form-36 Questionnaire (SF-36), in the first week of admission and at the end of the study. It is a multipurpose, short-form health survey with 36 questions, which yielded an 8-scale profile of scores as well as Physical Component Scale and Mental Component Scale summary measures. It was translated and standardized for the Greek Population [21].

Aquatic exercise program

Aquatic training was conducted in water on non-dialysis days, for a period of 4 months, three times a week for 60 minutes at a time. Patients were required to attend at least 80% of all sessions over the four-month period. At the start the intensity of the program was based on individual’s tolerance and further gradually modified by the patients’ perceived exertion and adaptation to the training program. Thus, exercise intensity and prescription was gradually increased as physiological adaptations occurred. During the training sessions heart rate was measured in each interval between the activities. Patients also rated their perceived exertion on a Borg Scale. They were encouraged to reach perceived exertion 13–14 (somewhat hard) on the Borg 6–20 category scale. The aquatic exercise program was constructed and supervised by an experienced exercise trainer, specialized in chronic diseases rehabilitation programs. The warm-up period lasted 10 minutes and included stretching exercises. Then the patients entered the pool and swam, gradually from 20 minutes at the beginning of the program to 40 minutes, according to individuals’ tolerance, with various types of swimming (free style, breast stroke, and back stroke) using foam tubes, buoyancy belts, and paddles. Relaxation exercises were conducted for 10 minutes after every session, including stretching and breathing exercise techniques.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL), version 16.0, software for Windows (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to examine the normality of the distribution. Changes of variables within the groups at baseline and the end of the study were evaluated by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures of variance with time and group being the independent variables. In addition, within group change from baseline was obtained by subtracting the final from the baseline values. Data are expressed as mean SD, with a significance level p<0.05.

Results

A total of 93.1% of participants (27 patients) completed all exercise sessions (Figure 1). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 27 patients are shown in Table 1. The results obtained from the functional capacity assessments, at baseline and follow-up, are presented in Table 2. All the exercised patients at the end of the study showed significant improvements in their health-related quality of life results (Table 3). In specific, after 4 months of training, the patients who attended the aquatic exercise program showed a significant improvement in the distance measured in 6-MWT by 12%, compared to initial assessment, walking 67 meters more (p<0.05). Furthermore, group A improved by 28.69% (p<0.05), compared to group B. Finally, group B showed a reduction of functional capacity by 9.74% (p<0.05) compared to its initial 6MWT assessment. In Sit to Stand test, group A improved initial measurement by 13.63% (p<0.05), being able to finish the test in 2.4 seconds quicker and thus group A improved in comparison to group B by 39.47% (p<0.05) showing a tendency. In Handgrip test, group A increased by 7.51% (p<0.05) the initial assessment, and group B showed a statistically significant decline by 5.84% (p<0.05), but even so, no statistical differences among groups were observed. In Sit and Reach test, group A improved first measurement by 87.24% (p<0.05) and also compared to group B follow up (p<0.05). Group B also diminished its initial assessment (p<0.0). In Timed Up and Go test, group A improved its initial assessment by 16.36% (p<0.05) and increased the difference by almost 50% compared to group B (p<0.05).

clinical-experimental-nephrology-Participant-flowchart

Figure 1: Participant flowchart.

  Group Α
(n=15)
Group B
(n=12)
P value
Male/Female 13/2 11/1  
Age (years) 48.0±11.3 48.6±15.4 0.4
BMI (kg/m2) 24.23±2.81 25.46±5.14 0.9
Ht(%) 36.8±3.4 36.3±3.7 0.7

Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients who completed the study (mean ± SD). Group Α=patients who followed aquatic training program, Group Β=Control Group; BMI: Body Mass Index; Ht: Hematocrit.

  Group A Group B Group A vs Group B
  Baseline Follow
up
P value Baseline Follow
up
P value Baseline Follow
up
6min walk test
(m)
558.8±127.5 625.6±128.1 .000 499.1±94.6 454.4±90.4 .002 .189 .001
Sit to stand (sec) 17.6±5.2 15.2±5.4 .000 20.2±6.7 21.2±6.5 .381 .270 .032
Handgrip (kg) 34.6±14.2 37.2±14.7 .002 34.3±9.6 32.3±9.9 .025 .956 .337
Sit and reach (cm) 4.7±9.1 -0.6±8.4 .000 8.1±12.1 11.3±12.7 .049 .408 .010
Timed up and go (sec) 5.5±1.4 4.6±1.4 .002 6.1±1.7 6.6±2.5 .090 .313 0.14

Table 2: Results of field tests of the groups at the beginning and the end of the training program (Mean ± SD). Group Α=patients who followed aquatic training program, Group Β=control group.

  Group A Group B Group A vs Group B
SF-36 Baseline Follow up P value Baseline Follow up P value Baseline Follow up
PCS 45.5±6.6 49.9±6.6 .001 46.3±8.1 43.9±8.8 .063 .795 .054
MCS 44.5±10.7 53.3±6.9 .000 41.9±10.2 39.0±10.4 .192 .521 .000

Table 3: Scores of quality of health- related quality of life indices. Values are mean ± SD. PCS: Physical Component Scale; MCS: Mental Component Scale.

Quality of life results

After the training program, in regards of the Physical Component Scale, group A showed statistically significant improvement by 9.67% (p<0.05). On the contrary, group B showed a decrease by 5.19%, but not statistically significant.

In Mental Component Scale group Α showed improvement after 4 months by 19.77% (p<0.05) and 26.83% (p<0.05) compared to follow ups with group B.

Discussion

The results of the present study demonstrated that an aquatic exercise program has favourable effects on functional capacity in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, indicating that exercise in water can be used as an alternative mode of exercise training in these patients. Even more, aquatic training helps improve health related quality of life, with its two branches, physical and mental aspect.

Previous research has shown significant benefits from exercise rehabilitation programs in health centers in HD patients. To date, there is shortage of evidence from randomized controlled studies on the effectiveness of aquatic exercise in chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis.

The performance at submaximal test (6MWT) improved by almost 67 meters, as aquatic exercise has been proposed as an effective form of exercise for improving overall fitness especially in individuals with low levels of physical fitness [22]. Relative improvements have been found in previous studies in respect to oxygen consumption and duration of exercise [5,15]. Increase of oxygen consumption is reported to be 20-40% in exercise programs on non-dialysis days in organized health centers, probably due to longer exercise duration or exercise intensity [5,23-25]. In a study from Moore et al. [26], of short duration (three months) and low impact aerobic exercise, patients physical fitness improved by 13% in accordance to this study.

Sit to Stand test is used as an indirect measurement of lower extremities strength, but can also reflect various parameters as balance, cardiovascular endurance, coordination, flexibility and satisfying range of motion [27]. In the present study HD patients improved their performance by almost 2.4 seconds, a corresponding finding to previous studies [18]. The improvement is statistically significant even though it is reported that high functional patients lack in comparison to healthy individuals [28]. The various properties of water, such as buoyancy, hydrostatic pressure and viscosity offer a unique advantage of safe training in health maintenance in chronic diseases [12]. This applies to AV fistula as well, since nephrologist’s advice that once the surgical site has healed, there are no restrictions on swimming or showering [29].

Uremic myopathy leads to loss of muscle mass and power. Regarding maximum strength of upper extremities Chang et al. [29] have recorded to be an independent factor of renal disease progression, as well as that grip strength is reduced in opposition to age. The present study showed that aquatic training in HD patients increased strengthening upper extremities muscles by 7.51%. This is consistent to other studies in which patients benefit from resistance exercise programs not only to preserve but to improve their muscular strength [18]. The resistive effect of water provides exercise loading during movement, which enhances muscular tension and increases energy expenditure beyond that achieved with land exercises [30].

The Sit to stand manoeuvre is another key functional activity of daily life. Flexibility of hamstrings in this study has shown significant improvement in aquatic exercising patients while controls showed a reduction of muscle elasticity. These findings are consistent with previous studies of Jang & Kim [31], in an exercise program of 12 weeks during hemodialysis and of Ling et al. [32] in a 3-month home exercise program of Tai Chi.

A usual test of neuromuscular function in chronic diseases is Timed Up and Go. Improvements through exercise have been reported in prior studies [19,32-34], consistent to the present study. In specific Heiwe et al. [33] with an exercise program of 12 weeks improved muscular function and walking ability of elderly patients with renal disease. Bullani et al. [35] reported significant improvement in Timed Up and Go test after a resistance training program (with Thera bands) during hemodialysis. The reduction in time required to complete the test is possibly attributed to the increase in muscle strength of lower extremities due to exercise in water. Moreover, these findings comply with previous researches reporting that it is highly important for HD patients the strengthening of lower extremities because it is combined with increased stability, sense of improved physical fitness and more effective handling of everyday activities [32].

Studies that have been conducted in other chronic diseases in regards to the effect of aquatic exercise programs, have shown that the advantages of training in the water are equal or even better than training in the land, such as walking or running. In specific a research conducted in a data base with more than 30.000 people in Cooper Clinic, has proved that the overall health benefits from training in water are comparable to training in land, with addicted advantage the wider range of application in special populations [36,37]. Finally, aquatic exercise has been reported to have beneficial effects in aerobic capacity and muscle strength in coronary artery disease patients, compared to land exercise [11].

Previous studies have strongly suggested that patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis are traditionally described as suffering from reduced health-related quality of life owing to general fatigue, exertional dyspnea during everyday activities, frequent hospitalizations, frustration, anxiety and depression [1,4,6].Thus regarding the evaluation of the effect of an aquatic exercise program to the quality of life of hemodialysis patients, a significant improvement was reported to the exercise group compared to control group. Similar finding have been ascertained in prior studies [4,25,38,39]. It is important to be noted that in exercising patients both parameters of SF-36 questionnaire were improved, physical and mental, while in controls there has been deterioration. Studies that have been conducted in other chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis and osteoarthritis are in accordance the present study, reporting that aquatic exercise improves patients’ health-related quality of life [8,40]. Among the psychological benefits of aquatic exercise are improved confidence, a more positive attitude (individually and as a group), a feeling of well-being, less stress and tension and more social interaction [41].

Results of this study must be interpreted in the face of certain method limitations. Outcomes including the clinical importance were not assessed. Also, a potential limitation is that patients living far away from a swimming pool don’t have the possibility to attend an aquatic program. Furthermore it became evident even during the initial briefing of patients, a reluctance of female patients to participate in sports activities. Lack of free time and social reasons were usually the justification. Finally, middle age patients volunteered to participate and not elderly ones, probably due to greater familiarity to water sport activities. Apart to these limitations the results of the present study demonstrate that an aquatic exercise program improves functional capacity, cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. Thus, aquatic exercise may be used as an alternative mode of exercise in rehabilitation programs aiming to increase exercise adherence in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis.

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References:

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Post your comment

Share This Article

Flyer image
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh